Lots of interesting abstracts and cases were submitted for TCTAP 2025. Below are the accepted ones after a thorough review by our official reviewers. Don’t miss the opportunity to expand your knowledge and interact with authors as well as virtual participants by sharing your opinion in the comment section!
TCTAP A-096
Lessons Learned From Technology-Based Physical Activity Promotion Programs for Asian American Midlife Women
By Wonshik Chee, Eun Ok Im, Dongmi Kim, Seulgi Ryu
Presenter
Seulgi Ryu
Authors
Wonshik Chee1, Eun Ok Im1, Dongmi Kim1, Seulgi Ryu1
Affiliation
University of Texas at Austin, USA1
View Study Report
TCTAP A-096
Digital Health and Artificial Intelligence
Lessons Learned From Technology-Based Physical Activity Promotion Programs for Asian American Midlife Women
Wonshik Chee1, Eun Ok Im1, Dongmi Kim1, Seulgi Ryu1
University of Texas at Austin, USA1
Background
Asian American midlife women are reportedly at high risk for chronic diseases (e.g., Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, depression). Despite recent advances in computer and mobile technologies, technology-based interventions have rarely been adopted and tested to promote physical activity among Asian American populations including Asian American midlife women. Subsequently, little is known about practical issues in adopting and using a technology-based physical activity promotion program among Asian American midlife women. The purpose of this presentation is to share the lessons learned from three studies where technology-based physical activity promotion programs were adopted and tested among Asian American midlife women.
Methods
The written memos of individual research team members while performing recruiting activities and the written records of research team meetings were analyzed using a content analysis.
Results
The lessons learned from the studies included: (a) the importance of individual coaching/support rather than group coaching/support; (b) the importance of a feasible intervention period, (b) appropriate inclusion/ exclusion criteria, and (d) advances in measurement devices (e.g., Fitbits) and the participants’ perception on measurement devices.
Conclusion
Several suggestions are made for future technology-based physical activity promotion interventions (e.g., individualization, selecting an appropriate intervention period, adopting innovative and creative motivation strategies, regular updates on new measurement devices).